Email this article 
Aims and Scopes
Indexing and Abstracting
Editorial Board
Author Guidelines
Submit a Manuscript
The Determinants of Districts/ Cities Spending in Aceh Province: an Analysis of Electoral Districts
- Abstract
- Keywords
- References
-
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the determinants of local expenditures (BD) of districts/cities in Aceh Province. This study used secondary data in form of budget realization reports and local expenditures of districts/cities in Aceh province from 2011 to 2015. Data were accessed on legal sites of Central Bureau of Statistic, the financial management and wealth agency of Aceh, and the Ministry of Finance. The result of this study indicated that Regional Gross Domestic Bruto (PDRB), Local Government Revenue (PAD), General Alocation Fund (DAU), and Special Allocation Fund (DAK) influenced local expenditures (BD). Based on the election areas 1 and 2, there were two differences in PDRB, PAD, DAU, and DAK. The other findings of this study revealed that there was a possibility of flypaper effect in the districts/cities of Aceh Province, and will be the further study.
-
Keywords
Determinants, Expenditure, Province, Aceh
-
References
[1] Heywood A. Key concepts in politics: Macmillan; 2000.
[2] Wahidin S. Konseptualisasi dan Perjalanan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar; 2011.
[3] Dahl RA. Democracy and its Critics: Yale University Press; 1989.
[4] Sanit A. Ormas dan politik: Lembaga Studi Informasi Pembangunan; 1995.
[5] Budiardjo M. †œDasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik―. GramediaPustakaUtama 2008 Jakarta. 2008.
[6] Napitupulu P. Pelayanan Publik & Customer Satisfaction, Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Agar Pelayanan Publik Lebih Berorientasi Pada Kepuasan dan Kepentingan Masyarakat. Bandung: PT Alumni. 2007.
[7] Rusadi K. Sistem Politik Indonesia. Sinar Baru, Bandung; 1988.
[8] Pitkin HF. The concept of representation: Univ of California Press; 1967.
[9] Rahman A. Sistem Politik Indonesia: Penerbit SIC kerjasama dengan LPM IKIP Surabaya; 2007.
[10] Krina LL, Lalolo L. Indikator & Alat Ukur Prinsip Akuntabilitas, Transparansi & Partisipasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Good Public Governance Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. 2003.
[11] Didjaja M. Transparansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2003.
[12] Kristiansen S, Santoso P. Surviving decentralisation?: Impacts of regional autonomy on health service provision in Indonesia. Health Policy. 2006;77(3):247-59.
[13] Rasul S. Pengintegrasian Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja dan Anggaran. Jakarta: Detail Rekod. 2002.
[14] Tjokroamidjojo B. Good governance: paradigma baru manajemen pembangunan: Lembaga Administrasi Negara, Republik Indonesia; 2001.
[15] Solihin D. Penerapan Good Governance di Sektor Publik untuk Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Lembaga Publik. Vol, No, hlm. 2007.
[16] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications; 2017.
[17] Lincoln YS, Lynham SA, Guba EG. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2011;4:97-128.
-
 View |
 Download |  Article ID: 17795 |
|
Facebook
Twitter
Linkedin
Google +